Skip to main content

Scribble



My parents can vouch for the fact that as a child i was a quick learner (learning ability gradually declined though). They didnt have any problem in teaching me the first 3 alphabets. In my brother's case it was quite different. Cat (my brother) was an extremely lazy child (thereafter he improved exponentially). Since i can't compare myself to him today, i will stick to the good old days when i was the "padhaku bachcha" and he was the "shaitaan bachcha".

I remember, one of those days when he had just started going to school, my father was sitting with him and trying to make him write "A-B-C" on a slate. First my father drew a big 'A' and asked him to try to copy it. Cat instead of drawing 'A' or anything near to it, just scribbled and said, "This is 'A'". I think this went on for another 10 times (cat was bold enough to try my father's patience). Abbu had already had enough of nonsense. He lifted my brother and placed him in the loft (an attic). I saw Cat bawling and shrieking. I had no idea what abbu will do next. I knew it was Cat who asked for the trouble and he deserved it (i was quite mean). After a few moments Cat was brought down and the first thing he did was complete recitation starting from A and ending at Z. :-)

Cat was taught addition and subtraction by substituting '5 pencils' with '5 chocolates'. Both Ammi and Abbu took extra pains in order to make him understand things. I missed that kind of attention and sometimes even felt jealous. In retrospect i feel that every child should be taught the way he/she understands best. The role a parent or a teacher plays has a lot of responsibilities.

Now, why did i write about all this? Or what prompted me to write this post?

Today we had a special colloquium by one of the group leaders in biology. She has recently published a report in a leading journal. She presented her work in a very simplistic manner so that the physicists and mathematicians could appreciate it. And she succeeded in doing so. I enjoyed the talk a lot.

Doing 'science' is one thing and communicating it to a varied audience is a another. One is incomplete without the other.

Comments

Anonymous said…
*nods wildly*

and if people donot teach you the way in which you learn best,
you shld teach yourself that way!.....

Agree the talk was good....but its a rather unbelievable prospect tht NOBODY from the so-called 'technical' fields can be clear to a general audience about wht they are saying!!!!! Dunno what htey are missing here!
AeutiKT said…
"Doing 'science' is one thing and communicating it to a varied audience is a another."

you are so right about that :-) It's a very difficult task.

Popular posts from this blog

A poem from childhood...

"Long legged Italy, kicked poor Sicily In the middle of Mediterranean Sea. Austria was Hungary Took a bit of Turkey Fried it in Japan Dipped it in Greece...." I remember only this much. This poem was my first attempt at learning the names of these countries and locating them on the map of the world. And I thought Austria and Australia were same. :-) It's time to confirm that I was wrong at that point of time, some twenty years back...

Rab Ne Bana Di Jodi

I went for this movie with zero-expectation just to watch SRK after a long interval of more than a year and I didn't get disappointed. Seriously, it is a very ordinary movie which takes up an age-old idea (of arranged marriage) and adds all kinds of 'spices' and SRK to it just to cater to a very specific kind of audience, which includes SRK fans and YRF loyals or time-pass movie goers. Surinder Sahni cannot be 'one' single man. There are many contradictions within this character. The man leads a dull, boring, monotonous life with his yellow suitcase, yellow tiffin, yellow car and a yellow bed sheet... (i might have missed other yellow objects around him). And he accepts the fact that he is indeed a boring person. Now, he decides to change his personality just to surprise his young, vibrant, newly-wedded wife. He turns himself into the "movie-hero" who makes his Taani ji smile. The surprising part is that he looks extremely comfortable in this new transfo

Ghajini

Finally I am writing about the movie I waited for so long. It took so much time because I was searching for a decent photograph of my hero :). Of course that's not the case. First of all I managed to watch the movie on 25th itself. How that happened is a very big story which i am not going to write here but it was a big adventure in a strange city. Had i been in Bombay, I would have watched the preview on 24th. So, my record didn't break. Just that instead of first show, I saw the second show of the movie. The peak of joy was getting the tickets and then with every scene the joy diminished. :( If Aamir Khan accepts a movie, there is a certain kind of expectation from it. This one was completely disappointing. It is a complete 'masala-movie' for the regular brainless-movie-goer. Why did he do this? It is not that the Tamil version was so great that he got tempted to do the remake. No point talking about the story here. I think everybody knows this "revenge saga of a